Bioinformatics FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) - What is bioinformatics
Part:
1
2
3
4
5
6
(Continued from previous part...)
"New" bioinformatics
The greatest achievement of bioinformatics methods, the Human Genome Project, is
currently being completed. Because of this the nature and priorities
of bioinformatics research and applications are changing. People
often talk portentously of our living in the "
post-genomic" era. My personal view is that this will affect
bioinformatics in several ways:
- Now we possess multiple whole genomes we can look for
differences and similarities between all the genes of multiple
species. From such studies we can draw particular conclusions
about species and general ones about evolution. This kind of
science is often referred to as comparative
genomics.
- There are now technologies designed to measure the relative
number of copies of a genetic message (levels of gene expression)
at different stages in development or disease or in different
tissues. Such technologies, such as DNA microarrays will grow in
importance.
- Other, more direct, large-scale ways of identifying gene
functions and associations (for example yeast
two-hybrid methods) will grow in significance and with them
the accompanying bioinformatics of functional
genomics.
- There will be a general shift in emphasis (of sequence
analysis especially) from genes themselves to gene
products. This will lead to:
- attempts to catalogue the activities and characterize
interactions between all gene products (in humans):
proteomics ).
- attempts to crystallize and or predict the structures of all
proteins (in humans): structural genomics.
- fewer DNA double-helices in bad sci-fi movies.
- What some people refer to as research or
medical informatics, the management of all
biomedical experimental data associated with particular molecules
or patients---from mass spectroscopy, to in vitro assays to
clinical side-effects---will move from the concern of those
working in drug company and hospital I.T. (information technology)
into the mainstream of cell and molecular biology and migrate from
the commercial and clinical to academic sectors.
This FAQ
concentrates on classical bioinformatics, but will, I hope, grow to
cover more of the "post-genomic" aspects of the field. It is worth
noting that all of the above non-classical areas of research depend
upon established sequence analysis techniques.
Definitions of Fields Related to
Bioinformatics
What is Biophysics?
Molecular biology itself grew out
of biophysics.The British Biophysical
Society defines biophysics as:
"an interdisciplinary field which applies techniques
from the physical sciences to understanding biological structure
and function" More
information about the various facets of the discipline can be
found at the society's
site hosted at Birkbeck
College, London.
Mike Goodrich wrote to ask what the status of biophysics was
given the definition of computational biology submitted by Paul
Schulte (below). A recent
article in The
Scientist [free registration required] dealt with this
question---thanks to Jo Wixon (Managing Editor of Comparative
and Functional Genomics) for the reference.
What is
Computational Biology?
Computational biologists might object (please
do), but, I find that people use "computational biology" when
discussing that subset of bioinformatics (in the broadest sense)
closest to the field of classical general biology.
Computational biologists interest themselves more with
evolutionary, population and theoretical biology rather than cell
and molecular biomedicine. It is inevitable that molecular biology
is profoundly important in computational biology, but it is
certainly not what computational biology is all about (see
next paragraph). In these areas of computational biology it seems
that computational biologists have tended to prefer statistical
models for biological phenomena over physico-chemical ones. This is
often wise...
One computational biologist (Paul J Schulte) did object to the
above and makes the entirely valid point that this definition
derives from a popular use of the term, rather than a correct one.
Paul works on water flow in plant cells. He points out that
biological fluid dynamics is a field of computational biology in
itself. He argues that this, and any application of computing to
biology, can be described as "computational biology" (see also the
"loose"
definition of bioinformatics below). Where we disagree, perhaps,
is in the conclusion he draws from this---which I reproduce in
full:
"Computational biology is not a "field", but an
"approach" involving the use of computers to study biological
processes and hence it is an area as diverse as biology itself."
Richard Durbin, Head of Informatics at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute,
expressed an interesting opinion on this distinction in an interview:
"I do not think all biological computing is
bioinformatics, e.g. mathematical modelling is not
bioinformatics, even when connected with biology-related problems.
In my opinion, bioinformatics has to do with management and the
subsequent use of biological information, particular genetic
information."
(Continued on next part...)
Part:
1
2
3
4
5
6
|